Tuesday 23 April 2024

‘Embarrassing failure’: UK ranks last in green spending among major European economies

 Well, would you expect anything less from our pathetic government? Reposted from Edie:


A new Greenpeace analysis has revealed that the UK ranks last on green spending out of the five biggest Western European economies, lagging behind France, Germany, Spain and Italy.

Published 5th March 2024

Save

‘Embarrassing failure’: UK ranks last in green spending among major European economies

In terms of fuels and technology innovation, the UK lags behind.

The analysis examines the International Energy Agency (IEA)’s government energy spending tracker from 2020 to 2023.

According to the data, the UK Government spends the least in total out of the five major countries, ranking the lowest for per capita green energy spending.

Additionally, it spends the lowest amount on low carbon transportation, compared to rest of the four nations, despite transport being UK’s largest emitting sector for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, accounting for 23% of the UK’s total emissions in 2022.

Italy invests significantly more than the UK in low-carbon and energy-efficient transport, allocating $47.8bn compared to the UK’s $13.1bn. Similarly, Germany’s investment in this sector is nearly three times that of the UK, totalling $38.1bn.

In terms of fuels and technology innovation, the UK lags behind all five countries analysed.

When it comes to energy-efficient buildings, households and industry, the UK ranks second to last among the major Western European economies. France outspends the UK nearly twofold in this category, allocating nearly $28.5bn compared to the UK’s $14.6bn.

Despite having similar population sizes, France’s per capita spending on green initiatives surpasses that of the UK by almost double, with $952.40 per capita compared to the UK’s $494.43 per capita.

Greenpeace UK climate campaigner Georgia Whitaker said: “It’s clear that despite the Government’s bluster, we are utterly failing on the world stage when it comes to green investment.

“Not only are the US and China leaving us in the dust in the race on green technology, we’re also doing terribly compared to our European neighbours.”

Recent research revealed that nearly two-thirds of UK energy companies have either shifted or intend to shift investments away from the UK to a market with supportive policies for their sustainability goals, risking a potential £115bn investment.

Whitaker added: “Jeremy Hunt should use the Spring Budget to address this embarrassing failure, but instead he’s flirting with tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthiest. Meanwhile, the rest of us struggle on with the cost of living.

“We urgently need a bold green industrial strategy to boost our flailing economy, help ordinary people with the cost of living, and tackle the climate crisis. Green infrastructure investment, with a focus on renewable energy, insulating our homes and making transport greener would do just that.”

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt is due to deliver his Spring Budget tomorrow (6 March) and the green economy is calling for the creation of a Net-Zero Investment Plan, including sector-specific emissions pathways and technology trajectories to tackle energy poverty and achieve clean economic growth.

Expand Oil Production - Receive Bonus, How Does That Help?

 This article reposted from Edie reveals the cynicism at the heart of the oil and gas industry.


Report: Oil and gas giants financially rewarding execs for expanding production

An analysis of the executive pay policies at large oil and gas firms has revealed that virtually all of them provide financial rewards for expanding production, hampering board-level preparation for the energy transition.

Author avatar image

Published 29th February 2024

Save

Report: Oil and gas giants financially rewarding execs for expanding production

Image: The Shell Appomattox deep-water asset, Gulf of Mexico. Image: Shell.

The analysis, conducted by Carbon Tracker, assessed 25 of the world’s largest listed oil and gas firms. All but one – Occidental Petroleum, based in Texas – incentivise executives to expand fossil fuel production.

Carbon Tracker has warned that this sends a conflicting message at companies that have set targets to cut production. For example, Eni and Repsol have both pledged to cut production by 30-35% this decade, but link more than one-fifth of their executive pay packages to KPIs that entail expanding production.

The analysis reveals a growing and worrying trend towards companies framing expanded gas production as a ‘low-carbon’ option in KPIs. This was found to be the case at firms including BP, ExxonMobil, Chevron and TotalEnergies.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) has repeatedly stated that transitioning the global energy system to net-zero by 2050 entails ending all upstream oil and gas projects with long lead times, beyond those already granted permission before 2021.

Moreover, even though current policy infrastructure and market trends are not aligned with this emissions reduction trajectory, the Agency is nonetheless expecting global oil demand to peak in 2028 and global gas demand to peak in 2030.

Carbon Tracker is warning that executives at oil and gas majors are ill-prepared to strategise around the accelerating pace of the energy transition. It is urging them to plan to decrease production over time and, if they do not do this voluntarily, for investors to exert pressure.

“The energy transition is accelerating, and oil and gas companies must plan for peaking demand for their product,” said Carbon Tracker’s lead for oil, gas and mining, Mike Coffin.

“Investors should be concerned executives are continued to be incentivised to grow production volumes and develop new long-cycle assets, particularly if this is contrary to stated company strategy. Asset owners and asset managers should use their votes accordingly to ensure that executives are acting in their best long-term interests.”

It bears noting that several of the 25 companies have decreased the proportion of executive pay linked to expanded production since 2020.  TotalEnergies decreased this from 13% to 4%, for example, while the reduction at EQT was the steepest, from 30% to 3%.

The research from Carbon Tracker follows on from its study last month which concluded that oil and gas operators in the North Sea are likely to see a drop of at least 63% in aggregate cash flows from existing extraction and exploration assets by 2030, compared with their expectations.

Monday 26 February 2024

 UK Government ministers are so obviously desperate:

Reposted from Edie


MPs seek certainty over environmental impact of UK’s largest post-Brexit trade deal

MPs on the Business and Trade Committee are calling for the Government to allow lawmakers to debate and vote on the UK's accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) trade bloc, partly due to environmental worries.




MPs seek certainty over environmental impact of UK’s largest post-Brexit trade deal

Last year, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced the UK’s intention to join the CPTPP after two years of negotiations, marking it as the country’s most significant post-Brexit trade deal yet.

The agreement is expected to facilitate increased trading opportunities with nations such as Australia, Japan and Mexico across various industries including food and drink, automotive, services and technology.

British Ministers claim that the deal will yield an additional £1.8bn in income for the UK over the next decade, supplementing revenue from existing bilateral trade agreements with some members.

However, MPs argue that estimating the benefits of CPTPP and its impact on economic growth remains challenging, particularly as Business and Trade Secretary Kemi Badenoch distanced herself from economic modelling produced by her own civil servants.

Business and Trade Committee’s chair Liam Byrne said: “Today, the Government’s target of covering 80% of trade with free trade agreements is beyond reach and we are off-track to meet the target of £1trn of exports by 2030.

“That is why CPTPP is important. But, for all its merits or drawbacks, if we’re serious about Parliamentary sovereignty, Government must let MPs debate the deal and vote on it.

“We need some hard-headed analysis of the economic benefits of the trade deals ministers propose to signs. It is simply not good enough for Secretaries of State to cast aside numbers produced by their own department, without providing their own figures.”

Controversial impacts of the agreement

Moreover, the MPs are also urging for a parliamentary vote due to the controversial environmental and ethical aspects of joining the trade bloc.

Concerns are high about the potential impact on UK safeguards regarding imports of controversial agri-food products, such as beef and pork treated with growth promoters, agri-food produced using pesticides banned in the UK, and palm oil linked to deforestation.

The Trade and Agriculture Commission has warned of potential increased imports of such products due to tariff reductions under the CPTPP, presenting a cost advantage over UK producers who are legally held to higher sustainability standards.

Moreover, contentious provisions within the agreement allowing foreign investors to sue governments over actions affecting their profits have raised alarms about the UK Government’s regulatory autonomy, particularly concerning the English water industry.

Worker rights implications also raise red flags, with concerns raised by the Trade Union Congress (TUC) regarding trade with nations like Malaysia, where evidence of forced labour exists, and Vietnam, where workers’ rights to unionise are restricted.

In response to these concerns, the Business and Trade Committee is urging  a debate and vote on the trade deal during the 21-day scrutiny period under the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010.

It is also calling for a revised impact assessment from the Government outlining the expected gains from CPTPP membership, and for clarity on measures to ensure UK businesses fully optimise the treaty’s benefits.

Friday 8 December 2023

Battery Strategy or Battery Stuttergy?

 Sunak claims that the recently unveiled UK Battery Strategy is part of HMG "going full throttle" to back UK business. However, as Kemi Badenoch acknowledges, the US and other countries are already grabbing market share through state subsidies. Once those plants are on the ground they will be had to compete against. "Full throttle" this ain't. Reposted from Edie.



What’s in the UK’s new battery strategy and advanced manufacturing plan?

The Department for Business and Trade launched the UK’s highly-anticipated Battery Strategy over the weekend, setting out a vision to grow supply chains and manufacturing capacity for batteries big and small this decade. Here, we summarise the key pledges it contains.

Author avatar image

Published 27th November 2023

Save

What’s in the UK’s new battery strategy and advanced manufacturing plan?

The Battery Strategy was published on Sunday (26 November), ahead of a major meeting of international investors hosted by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak on Monday (27 November).

It seeks to allay concerns about the UK falling behind in the global race to scale supply chains and manufacturing capacity for batteries necessary for the net-zero transition – whether they are those found in electric vehicles (EVs) or those used in grid-scale energy storage projects.

Business and Trade Secretary Kemi Badenoch has stated that while markets like the US have “embarked on large tax and spending sprees to claim a share of the global market”, her team will not allow the UK to be “drawn in to a distortive subsidy strategy”.

“For those of us who believe in the power of the market, the key to unlocking continued growth in our manufacturing industry is capital investment from the private sector, which sustains jobs and growth for the UK,” Badenoch added in her foreword to the Strategy document.

The Strategy stipulates that the UK Government expects to leverage £5 of private investment for every £1 of spending from public sources. In terms of public spending, the Strategy promises more than £60m of new funding, including:

  • An additional £38m for the UK Battery Industrialisation Centre, which focuses on research and innovation
  • An additional £12m for the new Advanced Materials Battery Industrialisation Centre, set up to bridge the gap between research and commercialization
  • An additional £11m for the Faraday Challenge, to support innovators
  • £20m for a new proof-of-concept scheme to develop a pathway for scaling university spin-outs
  • Further “sustained, consistent and targeted support” for specific projects across the whole value chain, on a case-by-case basis

The Strategy document reiterates the £2bn package that was already confirmed to support the automotive manufacturing sector’s net-zero transition ahead of last week’s Autumn Statement. This funding is to be spent between 2025 and 2030.

The funding is being allocated to support a three-pronged strategy covering designing new technologies; building out supply chains and manufacturing capacity; and sustaining future growth through skills planning and collaboration.

As well as direct funding, the Strategy stipulates changes to the tax relief system for research-intensive SMEs, due to take effect in April 2024. SMEs will be able to allocate 40% of their investment to R&D, up from 30%, and still claim an enhanced rate of relief.

The Strategy additionally sates that the Government will commence exploratory work on new R&D centres, co-located with EV manufacturing hubs, next year.

It will also consult on new rules and guidelines for end-of-life battery management. This process can hopefully begin before the general election.

Advanced manufacturing plan

Alongside the Battery Strategy, the Department for Business and Trade also published an Advanced Manufacturing Plan.

A new critical imports and supply chains strategy, to support both the Advanced Manufacturing Plan and Battery Strategy, has been promised “shortly”.

The Advanced Manufacturing Plan provides more details on the measures announced before and during the Autumn Statement, including:

  • A total of £4.5bn of Government spending on manufacturing, to be spent from 2025
  • The full expensing scheme being made permanent, enabling businesses to claim back relief for spending on certain kinds of new equipment
  • An extension of the Made Smarter scheme
  • £300m in annual tax relief for businesses meeting energy efficiency requirements under a new six-year Climate Change Agreement scheme
  • An extension to the Industrial Energy Transformation Fund backed with £185m

In terms of new information, the plan pledges £50m from Westminster coffers for a new two-year programme to develop new apprenticeships for careers in low-carbon manufacturing.

This will feed in to a new skills strategy, which is due in early 2024 and will have green jobs as the primary focus. The UK Government has long been called upon to update its strategic education and skills plans after legislating for net-zero by 2050 in 2019.

Also in early 2024, the plan states, the Government will publish a roadmap detailing plans to scale the UK’s solar generation capacity to 70GW by 2035. The roadmap will be based on the work of the solar industry taskforce set up earlier this year and, given the Government’s reservations about expanding solar on farmland, is expected to contain much detail on scaling onsite solar on commercial and industrial buildings like warehouses and factories.

On the topic of taskforces, the Plan confirms the launch of a new hydrogen taskforce to assess the best delivery pathway for meeting the UK’s 2030 hydrogen production target. The Government is targeting 10GW of low-carbon manufacturing capacity by the end of the decade, at least half of which should be renewable. The new taskforce should publish its initial recommendations in spring 2024.

Announcing the Plan, Sunak said: “We are going full throttle to back British businesses and make the UK a world leader in manufacturing – which already makes up over 43% of all our exports and employs 2.6 million people across the country.

“Today’s plan will not only give the industry the long-term certainty they need to grow and invest further in the UK, but it will also lay the foundations to create more jobs and opportunities for people across the country.”

Labour has said that the Plan is not sufficient to make up for past missed opportunities to invest strategically in low-carbon manufacturing.

“The past 13 years of Conservative government has been marked by a complete lack of stability, consistency and ambition which has turned potential investors away from Britain,” said Jonathan Reynolds, shadow trade and business secretary.